New legislation protects freelancers in New York State.

If you are a contracted worker or freelancer, or you use contracted workers, you should be aware that on May 19, 2024, the “Freelance Isn’t Free Act,” goes into effect throughout New York State. This law adds Section 191-d to New York Labor Law and creates obligations regarding the treatment of independent contractors.  The new law applies to agreements with contractors valued at $800 or more within a 120-day period. Exceptions include certain sales representatives, lawyers, doctors, and construction contractors.

Under the Freelance Isn’t Free Act, contracts must include the name and mailing address of the contractor and hiring party, itemization of all services to be provided, information about the value of the services to be provided and the rate of compensation, the dates when services must be rendered, and the dates when payments must be made. The Freelance Isn’t Free Act also describes procedures for filing complaints in Court or with the Commissioner of Labor and allows for potential damages for noncompliance.

If you need assistance regarding a freelancer contract, contact us at info@laurawongpanlaw.com.

Attorney advertising. No legal advice is provided on this website. When initially contacting the office, please do not include any confidential or sensitive information before a conflict check has be

en completed. Any contact form on this website sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Do Non-Compete Agreements violate Federal law?

On May 30, 2023, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board issued a memo to all NLRB Directors and Officers, advising them of the NLRB's view that non-compete provisions in employment contracts and severance agreements violate the National Labor Relations Act, with a few limited exceptions. The memo explains that broad non-compete agreements violate Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act by interfering with employee's ability to resign to secure better working conditions, to solicit their co-workers to join them, and to accept employment in their field of expertise with a competitor who might offer better working conditions.

According to the General Counsel: “Non-compete provisions reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of Section 7 rights when the provisions could reasonably be construed by employees to deny them the ability to quit or change jobs by cutting off their access to other employment opportunities that they are qualified for based on their experience, aptitudes, and preferences as to type and location of work."

The General Counsel wrote that there may be narrow exceptions, including when noncompete agreements narrowly restrict the employee from managerial or ownership interests in a competing business.

For more information contact Law Office of Laura Wong-Pan PLLC at 845-218-1288 or info@laurawongpanlaw.com.

© 2023 Law Office of Laura Wong-Pan PLLC ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

Confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in severance agreements are deemed unlawful.

In a major decision reversing at least two prior decisions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has determined that non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses in the separation agreement that an employer gave to its employees when they were laid off, violates Federal law. See McLaren Macomb and Local 40 RN Staff Council, OPEIU, Case No. 07-CA-263041 (NLRB, Feb. 21, 2023).

When entering into separation or settlement agreements, employers routinely require confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements, which restrict employees’ ability to disclose the terms of the agreement and sometimes restrict them from disclosing any facts leading up to their separation from employment, to anyone but their lawyers and accountants. Similarly, employers also often insist on non-disparagement language, which prohibit the former employees from saying anything negative about the company, or communicating their workplace grievances to others, and subjecting them to hefty penalties should they violate those clauses, which are typically effective for their rest of their lives. This decision calls into question the validity of that practice which, virtually always, provides more significant benefits to the employers than the employees.

The risk of a former employer having to pay a corporate employer’s legal bill for violating these clauses is a particularly harsh remedy that, if enforced, could well bankrupt a typical worker.

The Federal law in question, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the rights of employees not only to form and join unions, but also to engage in “protected concerted activities,” which includes collaborating with others to improve terms and conditions of employment. These rights are called “Section 7 rights,” falling under Section 7 of the NLRA, and extend to nonsupervisory employees in non-unionized and unionized workplaces.

In the McLaren Macomb case, the NLRB concluded that employees have the right to use administrative, judicial, legislative, and political channels, or to publicize their issues in the media, or on the internet when there is an ongoing labor dispute, and that the non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses interfered with those rights.

The NLRB wrote that “inherent in any severance agreement requiring workers not to engage in protected concerted activity is the coercive potential of the overly broad surrender of NLRA rights if they wish to receive the benefits of the agreement. (p. 7)

An appeal will most likely be filed, and many interest groups will undoubtedly seek to intervene to submit “friend of the court,” or amicus curiae briefs. In the meantime, the employment law landscape will be altered. If employers continue to insist on nondisparagement and confidentiality clauses in their separation agreements with non-supervisory employees, they risk violating the NLRA and invalidating the entire agreement, yet it is often these clauses, in conjunction with the general release of rights to sue, which drives a settlement.

At this point, it would be wise for employers to immediately cease from including confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in their separation or severance agreements.

Click -HERE to access the NLRB decision.